Comments made by Starwithnoname
| Date | Comment | Vote | Site |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2010 |
Poor |
Fucking Machines | |
| Sep 13, 2009 |
Great! |
Fucking Machines | |
| Sep 8, 2009 |
Great! |
Fucking Machines |
| Date | Comment | Vote | Site |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2010 | Much as I don't want the models to fake it and carry on with silly "oohs and aaahs", at least to look like you're enjoying it would be a good start. Ultra boring - sorry to have to say it. |
Poor |
Fucking Machines |
| Sep 13, 2009 | There seems to be a demand for "natural" women. I would rather see an overweight plain looking woman (not that this woman is)absolutely getting off on the machines, than a professional porn "ooh-rr give it to me baby" model going through the motions and giving many punters what they want - which is a show. I find the "idea" of the ordinary woman genuinely getting off far more erotic that a slim, shaved, helium-ballooned chested model going through the motions - often fake I suspect. I don't wish to dispute others who may feel differently, it's just a personal view. |
Great! |
Fucking Machines |
| Sep 8, 2009 | Like mrarff, I think the her alure is due to her natural beauty and charm. It is so good to see "the girl next door" on the machines rather than the "ooh-yeah, give it to me baby" professional porn models. Professionals would make all the right noises regardless of whether they found it a turn on or not - after all they are giving the punters what they want - a show. I would rather more "real" women, dare I say who may be less that supermodels and perhaps a little overweight, without pumped helium breasts and a bit of pubic hair - but hey, that's my opinion and I'm sure others would disagree, but may strike a chord with some. |
Great! |
Fucking Machines |
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement All material shown on this website is consensual. No model was harmed during the filming of these movies. Copyright ©2013 Kink.com