Sadistic Rope Presents Something Familiar Featuring Ariel X
Fucking Machines - She Comes in Pretty, Leaves Fucked Out. New HD Update Every Wednesday plus Live Shows and Bonus Shoots.

Comments made by a_divinicus

Date Comment Site
Jun 30, 2007

Tomcat: I have to admit ... I'm very impressed with the way your mind works. I see no one else has mentioned it thus far, so I will: making her "chase" the vibrator at the beginning in the first scene was super-hot. You continue to do excellent work.

Fucking Machines
Jun 8, 2007

I'm going to have to disagree with muddy also. I don't come to this site for the "fucking" factor, or the "machine" factor. What really turns me on is watching a woman experience pleasure. The reason that I subscribe to fuckingmachines is simply because the folks here give me more of that (or do a better job of convincing me that it's real) than any other site I've found.

Fucking Machines
May 7, 2007

Awesome beyond any superlatives. I've been a member of FM on and off for a few years now, and this is definitely among my most favorite of everything I've seen. Honestly, I'm consistently pleased with the content on FM, but rarely am I truly impressed. This impressed me; a lot. I agree with Philosophe ... whatever you paid her, she should get a bonus. Hell. I'd even pay it myself. :) To tomcat and whoever else was responsible for this: wherever this girl and this shoot came from, go back to that place and find more. More of her, more like her, and more shoots like this one. Excellent work, all.

Fucking Machines
Apr 2, 2007

Why is that we're trending towards long interviews at the beginning of the shoot? A minute or so, sure ... but some of the recent ones have been four or (I think) five minutes long. Have a look at the Sammie Rhodes shoot ... there was a beautiful shoot with no interview at all. Isn't there a song ... "a little less talk, a little more action" or something like that? :) I don't mean to be an asshole, and maybe I'm not representative, but I'm not paying for conversation.

Fucking Machines
Apr 19, 2006

Look, guys, I think it's important to point out here that even though it is proven that some women can ejaculate fluid when they orgasm, that doesn't mean that every time you see fluid squirting out of a woman she's having an ejaculatory orgasm. Especially in the world of porn, what is to say that a porn actress *hasn't* just had a lot of water before her shoot, and that she *doesn't* just fake orgasm and pee a little bit (or a lotta bit as the case may be)? Hell, all of us are fully aware that there are cuts in the videos we see on here. Why couldn't she drink a large amount of water between each take? The fact that some women ejaculate when they orgasm doesn't change the fact that the only thing we have to "prove" that what we're seeing isn't pee is Annie's word. Ultimately, you're watching a video. That means you're partaking of a fantasy. She could be squirting cum, she could be squirting urine. If either of those makes the fantasy more enjoyable for you, believe that and be happy in your fantasy. If neither of them does, then find a different fantasy.

Fucking Machines
Apr 2, 2005

What was done well: (1) Kurt, you acted this scene wonderfully. I don't know if you were in complete control of the scene or if you were following a director, but great job either way. (2) I liked the blow job scene. Normally I don't very much enjoy bjs in porn, but this one I liked. Perhaps a combo of the leash action, and just the abandon with which you two attacked the scene. (3) It was good to see a dom who isn't afraid to be rough. Often in professional porn, the actors seem to be just faking the roughness in the submission shoots ... and it was good to see that Kurt wasn't afraid to hit Sydnee hard enough so that we could tell he wasn't faking. (4) The costumes here were well done. Kurt's outfit was very nice, and I especially loved Sydnee's shoes. (5) I loved seeing the begging in this shoot. Specifically, I liked seeing Sydnee beg to cum ... however there were some problems in this area that I'll address in the next section. (6) The interview at the end was very good. Often in these interviews, the models give the impression, "Gee, I'm hot, but I don't really know what to say ... asking me my opinions is really pushing me." and I think that Kurt, and Sydnee, come across as very articulate in this after-interview. ========== What I think could use improvement: (1) The opening interview was not the same quality as the ending interview. When the interview turns into: "Do you like this?" "Yep." "Do you like that?" "Yep." ... I begin to wonder if Sydnee isn't bored with the shoot already at 60 seconds in. (2) Often in the "Say you want my cock" or "Say you want" whatever else sections, it seems, from the expression on her face, that Sydnee is just humoring Kurt. At one or two points in the shoot, it even looks like she's trying hard not to laugh. This really kills the mood. (3) It feels weird to me that the dom here is shorter than his sub. In some places, he looks like a pissed off monkey. I've looked up some background on Kurt for some perspective ... says he's 5'10" which means that Sydnee must be around 6'. Those extra couple of inches really stand out in a few places. Unfortunately, some of the scenes in which he is in the best position to dominate her also emphasize this height difference the most. At the point when he's standing on a wooden palate and still has to be on his tip-toes ... it just stops working for me. However, the scene when she's on her back and he's holding onto the collar she wears is an excellent scene. He can dominate, and, at the same time, the height difference is un-noticeable. ========== Well, that's all I have about this shoot. Good job to you both, (and Kurt, you were right when you said to Sydnee about the bj, "But the folks at home like it that way.")

Sex And Submission
Apr 1, 2005

P.S. I was also noticing that some leash play had been suggested by a few commenters. I think that would also have played very well in this shoot. Definitely use it in the future. Also, I have to agree with vidman357 when he says on the previous page: "[snip]but at the same time, this site should actually go back and forth between females in latex to males in latex, mixing and matching the Dom/mes with the particular orientation of the sub for that shoot--but focusing entirely on females in latex leaves an entire segment of the population out in the cold. I noticed that you are looking for someone to direct gay members to your membership; using the male/male setup would help with that some [snip]". I really think that mixing men into your shoots would be an excellent move ... and I also think that a male/male shoot in this setting could come off very well.

Kink.com Test Shoots
Apr 1, 2005

Here are my feelings on what you did very well with this shoot: 1.) Donna appeared to really be controling the action, rather than responding to a director somewhere off camera. If she was, great, if there was a director, great job at making the 'dom' appear to be controlling the action. 2.) The costuming was also excellent. Especially in the first scene -- Oh! Those shoes! -- I couldn't decide whether I felt bad for Jenilee because of how hard it must have been to walk in them, or aroused for the same reason. Donna's costume was also very sexy, excellent job of using the costumes to make the models look even better. 3.) On a related note, I think the sets were excellent here as well. They really fit the mood so well that you almost don't even notice them. 4.) Donna (or the invisible director if there was one) did an excellent job of controling the action, especially in the scene with the strap-on. Normally I'm not a fan of strap-ons ... I'd rather see a machine or a real guy, but in this scene, you guys all did a great job making the strap-on seem like the very best tool to be used in that scenario. So a special kudos to the models, director, and cameraman(men) on that scene. 5.) The vac-bed was great. Maybe I just don't get into fetish as much as I ought to, but I'd never seen one done well like that before. The presentation of the vertical vac-bed is really an interesting idea, and I think you guys did very well with it. Now, onto the things I felt could have been improved: 1.) I had trouble believing some of the orgasms. In the first scene, I specifically recall thinking, "Wow, Donna must have been *REALLY* hot to begin with for her to get off that fast." I also wondered about Jenilee's orgasm in the strap-on scene ... it just didn't seem realistic to me. (Maybe I'm reading too much into it, it was afterall a porn video, not an amateur sex tape.) 2.) I would have really liked to see more orgasm denial in this shoot. I like that Jennilee was asking for permission to cum, but in every instance except one, Donna immediately granted permission. The one time she denied it, she ended up letting Jenni cum about two minutes later. I cannot stress enough how much I think it would add to the mood of a shoot like this to have the sub model begging the dom to let her cum. 3. What was the deal with that little stick Donna was using in the third scene? At the end interview, Jenni said it hurt a lot, but in the scene itself, it just wasn't believeable ... frankly it looked like Donna was just flogging Jenni with a toothpick. And while I'm on the topic of floggings, I didn't really enjoy the "whipping" in the vac-bed scene. To me, it looked like Donna was just swishing Jenni. Maybe it was just in the way it was shot, but I came away that Donna was willing to spank Jenni, but when it came to the vac-bed scene, she seemed afraid to hurt her which really robbed the mood. Finally, the things that don't really fit into either category: 1) I think the idea of a "gold-pass" membership is something that will really do well, but it's been talked about enough that all I have to say is "Oui, d'accord." :) 2) I wasn't really wild about the scene transitions, but I honestly don't have any idea how to improve them ... they just felt ... off. 3) For a lot of the shoot, it was hard to tell whether Jenni was supposed to be laughing, crying, or cumming. Jenni, if you really got into this shoot, and that's just what came out ... great, I'm glad you had fun. If you were acting it, however ... perhaps you could find a way to clear up the confusion. (and I say that with utter lack of malevolence and sarcasm ... it is a genuine suggestion). I hope this feedback has helped, and it looks like you've got a good thing started here. Best of luck!

Kink.com Test Shoots
Mar 25, 2005

"Who is the creepy little jerkoff in the lederhosen?" Ok. That's hillarious. And while I completely agree that we need to keep the men in the shoot to a minimum, THAT "creepy little jerkoff" is CLEARLY wearing overalls, not lederhosen.

Fucking Machines
Mar 25, 2005

"Yes, I agree about suckers == good. I'll try to remember to use them more in upcoming shoots. -- G-Force" Webmaster: If I may log an opinion too ... I don't mind the suckers, but personally, I think they've been really over-used in a lot of the shoots. Personally I like the smaller nipple and clit ones much better than the big "whole breast" or "vulva-suckers" or whatever they're called. So ... definitely use the suckers because some folks like them, but don't AT ALL feel like they need to make an appearance in every shoot.

Fucking Machines
Mar 24, 2005

**THIS** is what I pay for. Simply AMAZING. Why can't we get more shoots like this one? Just a beautiful woman (or WOMEN) having fun with the machines and each other ... no silly contrived scenes, no men in the shot. Don't get me wrong ... nothing wrong with men, but when I come to fuckingmachines, I expect the machines to do the fucking. This shoot is TOP FUCKING NOTCH! Bravo to all involved.

Fucking Machines